Three tightly-scoped built-in skill consolidations to reduce redundancy in the available_skills listing injected into every system prompt: 1. gguf-quantization → llama-cpp (merged) GGUF is llama.cpp's format; two skills covered the same toolchain. The merged llama-cpp skill keeps the full K-quant table + imatrix workflow from gguf and the ROCm/benchmarks/supported-models sections from the original llama-cpp. All 5 reference files preserved. 2. grpo-rl-training → fine-tuning-with-trl (folded in) GRPO isn't a framework, it's a trainer inside TRL. Moved the 17KB deep-dive SKILL.md to references/grpo-training.md and the working template to templates/basic_grpo_training.py. TRL's GRPO workflow section now points to both. Atropos skill's related_skills updated. 3. guidance → optional-skills/mlops/ Dropped from built-in. Outlines (still built-in) covers the same structured-generation ground with wider adoption. Listed in the optional catalog for users who specifically want Guidance. Net: 3 fewer built-in skill lines in every system prompt, zero content loss. Contributor authorship preserved via git rename detection.
16 KiB
GRPO (Group Relative Policy Optimization) — Deep Guide
Expert-level patterns, critical insights, and production-ready workflows for fine-tuning language models with custom reward functions using TRL's GRPOTrainer. This is the deep reference for the GRPO workflow summarized in the main skill.
When to use GRPO
Use GRPO when you need to:
- Enforce specific output formats (XML tags, JSON, structured reasoning)
- Teach verifiable tasks with objective correctness metrics (math, coding, fact-checking)
- Improve reasoning capabilities by rewarding chain-of-thought patterns
- Align models to domain-specific behaviors without labeled preference data
- Optimize for multiple objectives simultaneously (format + correctness + style)
Do NOT use GRPO for:
- Simple supervised fine-tuning tasks → use SFT
- Tasks without clear reward signals
- When you already have high-quality preference pairs → use DPO/PPO
Core concepts
1. GRPO algorithm fundamentals
Key mechanism:
- Generates multiple completions per prompt (group size: 4–16)
- Compares completions within each group using reward functions
- Updates policy to favor higher-rewarded responses relative to the group
Critical differences from PPO:
- No separate reward model needed
- More sample-efficient (learns from within-group comparisons)
- Simpler to implement and debug
Mathematical intuition:
For each prompt p:
1. Generate N completions: {c₁, c₂, ..., cₙ}
2. Compute rewards: {r₁, r₂, ..., rₙ}
3. Learn to increase probability of high-reward completions
relative to low-reward ones in the same group
2. Reward function design philosophy
Golden rules:
- Compose multiple reward functions — each handles one aspect (format, correctness, style)
- Scale rewards appropriately — higher weight = stronger signal
- Use incremental rewards — partial credit for partial compliance
- Test rewards independently — debug each reward function in isolation
Reward function types:
| Type | Use Case | Example Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Correctness | Verifiable tasks (math, code) | 2.0 (highest) |
| Format | Strict structure enforcement | 0.5–1.0 |
| Length | Encourage verbosity/conciseness | 0.1–0.5 |
| Style | Penalize unwanted patterns | −0.5 to 0.5 |
Implementation workflow
Step 1: Dataset preparation
Critical requirements:
- Prompts in chat format (list of dicts with
roleandcontent) - Include system prompts to set expectations
- For verifiable tasks, include ground truth answers as additional columns
from datasets import load_dataset, Dataset
SYSTEM_PROMPT = """
Respond in the following format:
<reasoning>
[Your step-by-step thinking]
</reasoning>
<answer>
[Final answer]
</answer>
"""
def prepare_dataset(raw_data):
"""Transform raw data into GRPO-compatible format.
Returns: Dataset with columns:
- 'prompt': List[Dict] with role/content (system + user messages)
- 'answer': str (ground truth, optional but recommended)
"""
return raw_data.map(lambda x: {
'prompt': [
{'role': 'system', 'content': SYSTEM_PROMPT},
{'role': 'user', 'content': x['question']}
],
'answer': extract_answer(x['raw_answer'])
})
Pro tips:
- Use one-shot or few-shot examples in the system prompt for complex formats
- Keep prompts concise (max_prompt_length: 256–512 tokens)
- Validate data quality before training (garbage in = garbage out)
Step 2: Reward function implementation
Template structure:
def reward_function_name(
prompts, # List[List[Dict]]: Original prompts
completions, # List[List[Dict]]: Model generations
answer=None, # Optional: Ground truth from dataset
**kwargs # Additional dataset columns
) -> list[float]:
"""Evaluate completions and return rewards (one per completion)."""
responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
rewards = []
for response in responses:
score = compute_score(response)
rewards.append(score)
return rewards
Example 1: correctness reward (math/coding)
def correctness_reward(prompts, completions, answer, **kwargs):
"""Reward correct answers with high score."""
responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
extracted = [extract_final_answer(r) for r in responses]
return [2.0 if ans == gt else 0.0
for ans, gt in zip(extracted, answer)]
Example 2: format reward (structured output)
import re
def format_reward(completions, **kwargs):
"""Reward XML-like structured format."""
pattern = r'<reasoning>.*?</reasoning>\s*<answer>.*?</answer>'
responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
return [1.0 if re.search(pattern, r, re.DOTALL) else 0.0
for r in responses]
Example 3: incremental format reward (partial credit)
def incremental_format_reward(completions, **kwargs):
"""Award partial credit for format compliance."""
responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
rewards = []
for r in responses:
score = 0.0
if '<reasoning>' in r: score += 0.25
if '</reasoning>' in r: score += 0.25
if '<answer>' in r: score += 0.25
if '</answer>' in r: score += 0.25
# Penalize extra text after closing tag
if r.count('</answer>') == 1:
extra_text = r.split('</answer>')[-1].strip()
score -= len(extra_text) * 0.001
rewards.append(score)
return rewards
Critical insight: Combine 3–5 reward functions for robust training. Order matters less than diversity of signals.
Step 3: Training configuration
Memory-optimized config (small GPU)
from trl import GRPOConfig
training_args = GRPOConfig(
output_dir="outputs/grpo-model",
# Learning rate
learning_rate=5e-6, # Lower = more stable
adam_beta1=0.9,
adam_beta2=0.99,
weight_decay=0.1,
warmup_ratio=0.1,
lr_scheduler_type='cosine',
# Batch settings
per_device_train_batch_size=1,
gradient_accumulation_steps=4, # Effective batch = 4
# GRPO-specific
num_generations=8, # Group size: 8–16 recommended
max_prompt_length=256,
max_completion_length=512,
# Training duration
num_train_epochs=1,
max_steps=None,
# Optimization
bf16=True, # Faster on A100/H100
optim="adamw_8bit", # Memory-efficient optimizer
max_grad_norm=0.1,
# Logging
logging_steps=1,
save_steps=100,
report_to="wandb",
)
High-performance config (large GPU)
training_args = GRPOConfig(
output_dir="outputs/grpo-model",
learning_rate=1e-5,
per_device_train_batch_size=4,
gradient_accumulation_steps=2,
num_generations=16, # Larger groups = better signal
max_prompt_length=512,
max_completion_length=1024,
num_train_epochs=1,
bf16=True,
use_vllm=True, # Fast generation with vLLM
logging_steps=10,
)
Critical hyperparameters:
| Parameter | Impact | Tuning Advice |
|---|---|---|
num_generations |
Group size for comparison | Start 8, increase to 16 if GPU allows |
learning_rate |
Convergence speed/stability | 5e-6 (safe), 1e-5 (faster, riskier) |
max_completion_length |
Output verbosity | Match your task (512 reasoning, 256 short answers) |
gradient_accumulation_steps |
Effective batch size | Increase if GPU memory limited |
Step 4: Model setup and training
Standard setup (Transformers + TRL)
import torch
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
from peft import LoraConfig
from trl import GRPOTrainer
model_name = "Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct"
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
model_name,
torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
attn_implementation="flash_attention_2", # 2–3× faster
device_map="auto",
)
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token
# Optional: LoRA for parameter-efficient training
peft_config = LoraConfig(
r=16,
lora_alpha=32,
target_modules=[
"q_proj", "k_proj", "v_proj", "o_proj",
"gate_proj", "up_proj", "down_proj",
],
task_type="CAUSAL_LM",
lora_dropout=0.05,
)
trainer = GRPOTrainer(
model=model,
processing_class=tokenizer,
reward_funcs=[
incremental_format_reward,
format_reward,
correctness_reward,
],
args=training_args,
train_dataset=dataset,
peft_config=peft_config, # Remove for full fine-tuning
)
trainer.train()
trainer.save_model("final_model")
Unsloth setup (2–3× faster)
from unsloth import FastLanguageModel
model, tokenizer = FastLanguageModel.from_pretrained(
model_name="google/gemma-3-1b-it",
max_seq_length=1024,
load_in_4bit=True,
fast_inference=True,
max_lora_rank=32,
)
model = FastLanguageModel.get_peft_model(
model,
r=32,
target_modules=["q_proj", "k_proj", "v_proj", "o_proj",
"gate_proj", "up_proj", "down_proj"],
lora_alpha=32,
use_gradient_checkpointing="unsloth",
)
# Rest is identical to the standard setup
trainer = GRPOTrainer(model=model, ...)
trainer.train()
Critical training insights
1. Loss behavior (EXPECTED pattern)
- Loss starts near 0 and INCREASES during training — this is CORRECT
- Loss measures KL divergence from initial policy; the model is learning (diverging from original behavior to optimize rewards)
- Monitor reward metrics, not loss, for progress
2. Reward tracking
Key metrics to watch:
reward— average across all completionsreward_std— diversity within groups (should remain > 0)kl— KL divergence from reference (should grow moderately)
Healthy pattern:
Step Reward Reward_Std KL
100 0.5 0.3 0.02
200 0.8 0.25 0.05
300 1.2 0.2 0.08 ← Good progression
400 1.5 0.15 0.12
Warning signs:
reward_std→ 0 (model collapsing to a single response)klexploding (> 0.5) — diverging too much, reduce LR- Reward stuck — reward functions too harsh or model capacity issue
3. Common pitfalls and solutions
| Problem | Symptom | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Mode collapse | All completions identical | Increase num_generations, add diversity penalty |
| No learning | Flat rewards | Check reward function logic, increase LR |
| OOM errors | GPU memory exceeded | Reduce num_generations, enable gradient checkpointing |
| Slow training | < 1 it/s | Enable use_vllm=True, use Unsloth, reduce seq length |
| Format ignored | Model doesn't follow structure | Increase format reward weight, add incremental rewards |
Advanced patterns
1. Multi-stage training
For complex tasks, train in stages:
# Stage 1: Format compliance
trainer_stage1 = GRPOTrainer(
model=model,
reward_funcs=[incremental_format_reward, format_reward],
...
)
trainer_stage1.train()
# Stage 2: Correctness
trainer_stage2 = GRPOTrainer(
model=model,
reward_funcs=[format_reward, correctness_reward],
...
)
trainer_stage2.train()
2. Adaptive reward scaling
class AdaptiveReward:
def __init__(self, base_reward_func, initial_weight=1.0):
self.func = base_reward_func
self.weight = initial_weight
def __call__(self, *args, **kwargs):
rewards = self.func(*args, **kwargs)
return [r * self.weight for r in rewards]
def adjust_weight(self, success_rate):
"""Increase weight if model struggling, decrease if succeeding."""
if success_rate < 0.3:
self.weight *= 1.2
elif success_rate > 0.8:
self.weight *= 0.9
3. Custom dataset integration
def load_custom_knowledge_base(csv_path):
import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_csv(csv_path)
return Dataset.from_pandas(df).map(lambda x: {
'prompt': [
{'role': 'system', 'content': CUSTOM_SYSTEM_PROMPT},
{'role': 'user', 'content': x['question']}
],
'answer': x['expert_answer']
})
Deployment and inference
Save and merge LoRA
if hasattr(trainer.model, 'merge_and_unload'):
merged_model = trainer.model.merge_and_unload()
merged_model.save_pretrained("production_model")
tokenizer.save_pretrained("production_model")
Inference
from transformers import pipeline
generator = pipeline("text-generation", model="production_model", tokenizer=tokenizer)
result = generator(
[
{'role': 'system', 'content': SYSTEM_PROMPT},
{'role': 'user', 'content': "What is 15 + 27?"},
],
max_new_tokens=256,
do_sample=True,
temperature=0.7,
top_p=0.9,
)
print(result[0]['generated_text'])
Best practices checklist
Before training:
- Validate dataset format (prompts as List[Dict])
- Test reward functions on sample data
- Calculate expected
max_prompt_lengthfrom data - Choose
num_generationsbased on GPU memory - Set up logging (wandb recommended)
During training:
- Monitor reward progression (should increase)
- Check
reward_std(should stay > 0.1) - Watch for OOM errors (reduce batch size if needed)
- Sample generations every 50–100 steps
- Validate format compliance on holdout set
After training:
- Merge LoRA weights if using PEFT
- Test on diverse prompts
- Compare to baseline model
- Document reward weights and hyperparameters
- Save reproducibility config
Troubleshooting
Debugging workflow
- Isolate reward functions — test each independently
- Check data distribution — ensure diversity in prompts
- Reduce complexity — start with single reward, add gradually
- Monitor generations — print samples every N steps
- Validate extraction logic — ensure answer parsing works
Quick debug reward
def debug_reward(completions, **kwargs):
responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
for i, r in enumerate(responses[:2]):
print(f"Response {i}: {r[:200]}...")
return [1.0] * len(responses)
# Test without training
trainer = GRPOTrainer(..., reward_funcs=[debug_reward])
trainer.generate_completions(dataset[:1])
Template
A production-ready training script lives at ../templates/basic_grpo_training.py. It uses Qwen 2.5-1.5B-Instruct with LoRA and three reward functions (incremental format, strict format, correctness) on GSM8K. Copy and adapt:
get_dataset()— swap in your data loader- Reward functions — tune to your task
SYSTEM_PROMPT— match your output formatGRPOConfig— adjust hyperparameters for your GPU
References and resources
- TRL GRPO Trainer: https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/grpo_trainer
- GRPO paper (DeepSeek): https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03300
- DeepSeek R1 paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12948
- Open R1 implementation: https://github.com/huggingface/open-r1
- TRL examples: https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples
- Unsloth (faster training): https://docs.unsloth.ai/
Critical reminders
- Loss goes UP during training — this is normal (it's KL divergence)
- Use 3–5 reward functions — single rewards often fail
- Test rewards before training — debug each function independently
- Monitor
reward_std— should stay > 0.1 (avoid mode collapse) - Start with
num_generations=4–8— scale up if GPU allows