hermes-agent/agent/background_review.py
teknium1 d35ee7bcdd
refactor(run_agent): move review prompts to agent/background_review.py
The three big review-prompt strings (_MEMORY_REVIEW_PROMPT,
_SKILL_REVIEW_PROMPT, _COMBINED_REVIEW_PROMPT — 183 lines combined) move
out of the AIAgent class body and into agent/background_review.py where
they're consumed.

AIAgent re-exposes them as class attributes via 'from ... import' inside
the class body — Python binds those names into the class namespace so
existing AIAgent._MEMORY_REVIEW_PROMPT references keep working.
spawn_background_review_thread also falls back to the module-level
constants if an agent doesn't have the attribute (preserves the test
pattern of mocking these on the agent).

tests/run_agent/ + tests/agent/: 4313 passed (same pre-existing
test_auxiliary_client failure).

run_agent.py: 9986 -> 9800 lines (-186).
2026-05-16 19:11:58 -07:00

554 lines
27 KiB
Python

"""Background memory/skill review — fork the agent to evaluate the turn.
After every turn, ``AIAgent.run_conversation`` may call
:func:`spawn_background_review` to fire off a daemon thread that replays
the conversation snapshot in a forked :class:`AIAgent` and asks itself
"should any skill/memory be saved or updated?". Writes go straight to
the memory + skill stores. Main conversation and prompt cache are never
touched.
The fork inherits the parent's live runtime (provider, model, base_url,
credentials, cached system prompt) so it hits the same prefix cache and
uses the same auth. It runs with a tool whitelist limited to memory and
skill management tools; everything else is denied at runtime.
See the ``hermes-agent-dev`` skill (``references/self-improvement-loop.md``)
for invariants and PR review criteria.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import contextlib
import json
import logging
import os
from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# Review-prompt strings — used by ``spawn_background_review_thread`` to build
# the user-message that the forked review agent receives. AIAgent exposes
# them as class attributes (``_MEMORY_REVIEW_PROMPT`` etc.) for back-compat;
# the actual text lives here so future edits are one-place.
_MEMORY_REVIEW_PROMPT = (
"Review the conversation above and consider saving to memory if appropriate.\n\n"
"Focus on:\n"
"1. Has the user revealed things about themselves — their persona, desires, "
"preferences, or personal details worth remembering?\n"
"2. Has the user expressed expectations about how you should behave, their work "
"style, or ways they want you to operate?\n\n"
"If something stands out, save it using the memory tool. "
"If nothing is worth saving, just say 'Nothing to save.' and stop."
)
_SKILL_REVIEW_PROMPT = (
"Review the conversation above and update the skill library. Be "
"ACTIVE — most sessions produce at least one skill update, even if "
"small. A pass that does nothing is a missed learning opportunity, "
"not a neutral outcome.\n\n"
"Target shape of the library: CLASS-LEVEL skills, each with a rich "
"SKILL.md and a `references/` directory for session-specific detail. "
"Not a long flat list of narrow one-session-one-skill entries. This "
"shapes HOW you update, not WHETHER you update.\n\n"
"Signals to look for (any one of these warrants action):\n"
" • User corrected your style, tone, format, legibility, or "
"verbosity. Frustration signals like 'stop doing X', 'this is too "
"verbose', 'don't format like this', 'why are you explaining', "
"'just give me the answer', 'you always do Y and I hate it', or an "
"explicit 'remember this' are FIRST-CLASS skill signals, not just "
"memory signals. Update the relevant skill(s) to embed the "
"preference so the next session starts already knowing.\n"
" • User corrected your workflow, approach, or sequence of steps. "
"Encode the correction as a pitfall or explicit step in the skill "
"that governs that class of task.\n"
" • Non-trivial technique, fix, workaround, debugging path, or "
"tool-usage pattern emerged that a future session would benefit "
"from. Capture it.\n"
" • A skill that got loaded or consulted this session turned out "
"to be wrong, missing a step, or outdated. Patch it NOW.\n\n"
"Preference order — prefer the earliest action that fits, but do "
"pick one when a signal above fired:\n"
" 1. UPDATE A CURRENTLY-LOADED SKILL. Look back through the "
"conversation for skills the user loaded via /skill-name or you "
"read via skill_view. If any of them covers the territory of the "
"new learning, PATCH that one first. It is the skill that was in "
"play, so it's the right one to extend.\n"
" 2. UPDATE AN EXISTING UMBRELLA (via skills_list + skill_view). "
"If no loaded skill fits but an existing class-level skill does, "
"patch it. Add a subsection, a pitfall, or broaden a trigger.\n"
" 3. ADD A SUPPORT FILE under an existing umbrella. Skills can be "
"packaged with three kinds of support files — use the right "
"directory per kind:\n"
" • `references/<topic>.md` — session-specific detail (error "
"transcripts, reproduction recipes, provider quirks) AND "
"condensed knowledge banks: quoted research, API docs, external "
"authoritative excerpts, or domain notes you found while working "
"on the problem. Write it concise and for the value of the task, "
"not as a full mirror of upstream docs.\n"
" • `templates/<name>.<ext>` — starter files meant to be "
"copied and modified (boilerplate configs, scaffolding, a "
"known-good example the agent can `reproduce with modifications`).\n"
" • `scripts/<name>.<ext>` — statically re-runnable actions "
"the skill can invoke directly (verification scripts, fixture "
"generators, deterministic probes, anything the agent should run "
"rather than hand-type each time).\n"
" Add support files via skill_manage action=write_file with "
"file_path starting 'references/', 'templates/', or 'scripts/'. "
"The umbrella's SKILL.md should gain a one-line pointer to any "
"new support file so future agents know it exists.\n"
" 4. CREATE A NEW CLASS-LEVEL UMBRELLA SKILL when no existing "
"skill covers the class. The name MUST be at the class level. "
"The name MUST NOT be a specific PR number, error string, feature "
"codename, library-alone name, or 'fix-X / debug-Y / audit-Z-today' "
"session artifact. If the proposed name only makes sense for "
"today's task, it's wrong — fall back to (1), (2), or (3).\n\n"
"User-preference embedding (important): when the user expressed a "
"style/format/workflow preference, the update belongs in the "
"SKILL.md body, not just in memory. Memory captures 'who the user "
"is and what the current situation and state of your operations "
"are'; skills capture 'how to do this class of task for this "
"user'. When they complain about how you handled a task, the "
"skill that governs that task needs to carry the lesson.\n\n"
"If you notice two existing skills that overlap, note it in your "
"reply — the background curator handles consolidation at scale.\n\n"
"Do NOT capture (these become persistent self-imposed constraints "
"that bite you later when the environment changes):\n"
" • Environment-dependent failures: missing binaries, fresh-install "
"errors, post-migration path mismatches, 'command not found', "
"unconfigured credentials, uninstalled packages. The user can fix "
"these — they are not durable rules.\n"
" • Negative claims about tools or features ('browser tools do not "
"work', 'X tool is broken', 'cannot use Y from execute_code'). These "
"harden into refusals the agent cites against itself for months "
"after the actual problem was fixed.\n"
" • Session-specific transient errors that resolved before the "
"conversation ended. If retrying worked, the lesson is the retry "
"pattern, not the original failure.\n"
" • One-off task narratives. A user asking 'summarize today's "
"market' or 'analyze this PR' is not a class of work that warrants "
"a skill.\n\n"
"If a tool failed because of setup state, capture the FIX (install "
"command, config step, env var to set) under an existing setup or "
"troubleshooting skill — never 'this tool does not work' as a "
"standalone constraint.\n\n"
"'Nothing to save.' is a real option but should NOT be the "
"default. If the session ran smoothly with no corrections and "
"produced no new technique, just say 'Nothing to save.' and stop. "
"Otherwise, act."
)
_COMBINED_REVIEW_PROMPT = (
"Review the conversation above and update two things:\n\n"
"**Memory**: who the user is. Did the user reveal persona, "
"desires, preferences, personal details, or expectations about "
"how you should behave? Save facts about the user and durable "
"preferences with the memory tool.\n\n"
"**Skills**: how to do this class of task. Be ACTIVE — most "
"sessions produce at least one skill update. A pass that does "
"nothing is a missed learning opportunity, not a neutral outcome.\n\n"
"Target shape of the skill library: CLASS-LEVEL skills with a rich "
"SKILL.md and a `references/` directory for session-specific detail. "
"Not a long flat list of narrow one-session-one-skill entries.\n\n"
"Signals that warrant a skill update (any one is enough):\n"
" • User corrected your style, tone, format, legibility, "
"verbosity, or approach. Frustration is a FIRST-CLASS skill "
"signal, not just a memory signal. 'stop doing X', 'don't format "
"like this', 'I hate when you Y' — embed the lesson in the skill "
"that governs that task so the next session starts fixed.\n"
" • Non-trivial technique, fix, workaround, or debugging path "
"emerged.\n"
" • A skill that was loaded or consulted turned out wrong, "
"missing, or outdated — patch it now.\n\n"
"Preference order for skills — pick the earliest that fits:\n"
" 1. UPDATE A CURRENTLY-LOADED SKILL. Check what skills were "
"loaded via /skill-name or skill_view in the conversation. If one "
"of them covers the learning, PATCH it first. It was in play; "
"it's the right place.\n"
" 2. UPDATE AN EXISTING UMBRELLA (skills_list + skill_view to "
"find the right one). Patch it.\n"
" 3. ADD A SUPPORT FILE under an existing umbrella via "
"skill_manage action=write_file. Three kinds: "
"`references/<topic>.md` for session-specific detail OR condensed "
"knowledge banks (quoted research, API docs excerpts, domain "
"notes) written concise and task-focused; `templates/<name>.<ext>` "
"for starter files meant to be copied and modified; "
"`scripts/<name>.<ext>` for statically re-runnable actions "
"(verification, fixture generators, probes). Add a one-line "
"pointer in SKILL.md so future agents find them.\n"
" 4. CREATE A NEW CLASS-LEVEL UMBRELLA when nothing exists. "
"Name at the class level — NOT a PR number, error string, "
"codename, library-alone name, or 'fix-X / debug-Y' session "
"artifact. If the name only fits today's task, fall back to (1), "
"(2), or (3).\n\n"
"User-preference embedding: when the user complains about how "
"you handled a task, update the skill that governs that task — "
"memory alone isn't enough. Memory says 'who the user is and "
"what the current situation and state of your operations are'; "
"skills say 'how to do this class of task for this user'. Both "
"should carry user-preference lessons when relevant.\n\n"
"If you notice overlapping existing skills, mention it — the "
"background curator handles consolidation.\n\n"
"Do NOT capture as skills (these become persistent self-imposed "
"constraints that bite you later when the environment changes):\n"
" • Environment-dependent failures: missing binaries, fresh-install "
"errors, post-migration path mismatches, 'command not found', "
"unconfigured credentials, uninstalled packages. The user can fix "
"these — they are not durable rules.\n"
" • Negative claims about tools or features ('browser tools do not "
"work', 'X tool is broken', 'cannot use Y from execute_code'). These "
"harden into refusals the agent cites against itself for months "
"after the actual problem was fixed.\n"
" • Session-specific transient errors that resolved before the "
"conversation ended. If retrying worked, the lesson is the retry "
"pattern, not the original failure.\n"
" • One-off task narratives. A user asking 'summarize today's "
"market' or 'analyze this PR' is not a class of work that warrants "
"a skill.\n\n"
"If a tool failed because of setup state, capture the FIX (install "
"command, config step, env var to set) under an existing setup or "
"troubleshooting skill — never 'this tool does not work' as a "
"standalone constraint.\n\n"
"Act on whichever of the two dimensions has real signal. If "
"genuinely nothing stands out on either, say 'Nothing to save.' "
"and stop — but don't reach for that conclusion as a default."
)
def summarize_background_review_actions(
review_messages: List[Dict],
prior_snapshot: List[Dict],
) -> List[str]:
"""Build the human-facing action summary for a background review pass.
Walks the review agent's session messages and collects "successful tool
action" descriptions to surface to the user (e.g. "Memory updated").
Tool messages already present in ``prior_snapshot`` are skipped so we
don't re-surface stale results from the prior conversation that the
review agent inherited via ``conversation_history`` (issue #14944).
Matching is by ``tool_call_id`` when available, with a content-equality
fallback for tool messages that lack one.
"""
existing_tool_call_ids = set()
existing_tool_contents = set()
for prior in prior_snapshot or []:
if not isinstance(prior, dict) or prior.get("role") != "tool":
continue
tcid = prior.get("tool_call_id")
if tcid:
existing_tool_call_ids.add(tcid)
else:
content = prior.get("content")
if isinstance(content, str):
existing_tool_contents.add(content)
actions: List[str] = []
for msg in review_messages or []:
if not isinstance(msg, dict) or msg.get("role") != "tool":
continue
tcid = msg.get("tool_call_id")
if tcid and tcid in existing_tool_call_ids:
continue
if not tcid:
content_str = msg.get("content")
if isinstance(content_str, str) and content_str in existing_tool_contents:
continue
try:
data = json.loads(msg.get("content", "{}"))
except (json.JSONDecodeError, TypeError):
continue
if not isinstance(data, dict) or not data.get("success"):
continue
message = data.get("message", "")
target = data.get("target", "")
if "created" in message.lower():
actions.append(message)
elif "updated" in message.lower():
actions.append(message)
elif "added" in message.lower() or (target and "add" in message.lower()):
label = "Memory" if target == "memory" else "User profile" if target == "user" else target
actions.append(f"{label} updated")
elif "Entry added" in message:
label = "Memory" if target == "memory" else "User profile" if target == "user" else target
actions.append(f"{label} updated")
elif "removed" in message.lower() or "replaced" in message.lower():
label = "Memory" if target == "memory" else "User profile" if target == "user" else target
actions.append(f"{label} updated")
return actions
def build_memory_write_metadata(
agent: Any,
*,
write_origin: Optional[str] = None,
execution_context: Optional[str] = None,
task_id: Optional[str] = None,
tool_call_id: Optional[str] = None,
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Build provenance metadata for external memory-provider mirrors."""
metadata: Dict[str, Any] = {
"write_origin": write_origin or getattr(agent, "_memory_write_origin", "assistant_tool"),
"execution_context": (
execution_context
or getattr(agent, "_memory_write_context", "foreground")
),
"session_id": agent.session_id or "",
"parent_session_id": agent._parent_session_id or "",
"platform": agent.platform or os.environ.get("HERMES_SESSION_SOURCE", "cli"),
"tool_name": "memory",
}
if task_id:
metadata["task_id"] = task_id
if tool_call_id:
metadata["tool_call_id"] = tool_call_id
return {k: v for k, v in metadata.items() if v not in {None, ""}}
def _run_review_in_thread(
agent: Any,
messages_snapshot: List[Dict],
prompt: str,
) -> None:
"""Worker function executed in the background-review daemon thread.
Spawns a forked ``AIAgent`` inheriting the parent's runtime, runs the
review prompt, and surfaces a compact action summary back to the user
via ``agent._safe_print`` and ``agent.background_review_callback``.
"""
# Local import to avoid a hard circular dep at module load.
from run_agent import AIAgent
from tools.terminal_tool import set_approval_callback as _set_approval_callback
# Install a non-interactive approval callback on this worker
# thread so any dangerous-command guard the review agent trips
# resolves to "deny" instead of falling back to input() -- which
# deadlocks against the parent's prompt_toolkit TUI (#15216).
# Same pattern as _subagent_auto_deny in tools/delegate_tool.py.
def _bg_review_auto_deny(command, description, **kwargs):
logger.warning(
"Background review auto-denied dangerous command: %s (%s)",
command, description,
)
return "deny"
try:
_set_approval_callback(_bg_review_auto_deny)
except Exception:
pass
review_agent = None
review_messages: List[Dict] = []
try:
with open(os.devnull, "w", encoding="utf-8") as _devnull, \
contextlib.redirect_stdout(_devnull), \
contextlib.redirect_stderr(_devnull):
# Inherit the parent agent's live runtime (provider, model,
# base_url, api_key, api_mode) so the fork uses the exact
# same credentials the main turn is using. Without this,
# AIAgent.__init__ re-runs auto-resolution from env vars,
# which fails for OAuth-only providers, session-scoped
# creds, or credential-pool setups where the resolver can't
# reconstruct auth from scratch -- producing the spurious
# "No LLM provider configured" warning at end of turn.
_parent_runtime = agent._current_main_runtime()
_parent_api_mode = _parent_runtime.get("api_mode") or None
# The review fork needs to call agent-loop tools (memory,
# skill_manage). Those tools require Hermes' own dispatch,
# which the codex_app_server runtime bypasses entirely
# (it runs the turn inside codex's subprocess). So when
# the parent is on codex_app_server, downgrade the review
# fork to codex_responses — same auth/credentials, but
# talks to the OpenAI Responses API directly so Hermes
# owns the loop and the agent-loop tools dispatch.
if _parent_api_mode == "codex_app_server":
_parent_api_mode = "codex_responses"
review_agent = AIAgent(
model=agent.model,
max_iterations=16,
quiet_mode=True,
platform=agent.platform,
provider=agent.provider,
api_mode=_parent_api_mode,
base_url=_parent_runtime.get("base_url") or None,
api_key=_parent_runtime.get("api_key") or None,
credential_pool=getattr(agent, "_credential_pool", None),
parent_session_id=agent.session_id,
)
review_agent._memory_write_origin = "background_review"
review_agent._memory_write_context = "background_review"
review_agent._memory_store = agent._memory_store
review_agent._memory_enabled = agent._memory_enabled
review_agent._user_profile_enabled = agent._user_profile_enabled
review_agent._memory_nudge_interval = 0
review_agent._skill_nudge_interval = 0
# Suppress all status/warning emits from the fork so the
# user only sees the final successful-action summary.
# Without this, mid-review "Iteration budget exhausted",
# rate-limit retries, compression warnings, and other
# lifecycle messages bubble up through _emit_status ->
# _vprint and leak past the stdout redirect (they go via
# _print_fn/status_callback, which bypass sys.stdout).
review_agent.suppress_status_output = True
# Inherit the parent's cached system prompt verbatim so
# the review fork's outbound HTTP request hits the same
# Anthropic/OpenRouter prefix cache the parent warmed.
# Without this, the fork rebuilds the system prompt from
# scratch (fresh _hermes_now() timestamp, fresh
# session_id, narrower toolset → different skills_prompt)
# and the byte-exact prefix-cache key misses. See
# issue #25322 and PR #17276 for the full analysis +
# measured impact (~26% end-to-end cost reduction on
# Sonnet 4.5).
review_agent._cached_system_prompt = agent._cached_system_prompt
# Defensive: pin session_start + session_id to the
# parent's so any code path that re-renders parts of
# the system prompt (compression, plugin hooks) still
# produces byte-identical output. The cached-prompt
# assignment above already short-circuits the normal
# rebuild path, but these pins guarantee parity even
# if a future code path bypasses the cache.
review_agent.session_start = agent.session_start
review_agent.session_id = agent.session_id
from model_tools import get_tool_definitions
from hermes_cli.plugins import (
set_thread_tool_whitelist,
clear_thread_tool_whitelist,
)
review_whitelist = {
t["function"]["name"]
for t in get_tool_definitions(
enabled_toolsets=["memory", "skills"],
quiet_mode=True,
)
}
set_thread_tool_whitelist(
review_whitelist,
deny_msg_fmt=(
"Background review denied non-whitelisted tool: "
"{tool_name}. Only memory/skill tools are allowed."
),
)
try:
review_agent.run_conversation(
user_message=(
prompt
+ "\n\nYou can only call memory and skill "
"management tools. Other tools will be denied "
"at runtime — do not attempt them."
),
conversation_history=messages_snapshot,
)
finally:
clear_thread_tool_whitelist()
# Tear down memory providers while stdout is still
# redirected so background thread teardown (Honcho flush,
# Hindsight sync, etc.) stays silent. The finally block
# below is a safety net for the exception path.
try:
review_agent.shutdown_memory_provider()
except Exception:
pass
try:
review_agent.close()
except Exception:
pass
review_messages = list(getattr(review_agent, "_session_messages", []))
review_agent = None
# Scan the review agent's messages for successful tool actions
# and surface a compact summary to the user. Tool messages
# already present in messages_snapshot must be skipped, since
# the review agent inherits that history and would otherwise
# re-surface stale "created"/"updated" messages from the prior
# conversation as if they just happened (issue #14944).
actions = summarize_background_review_actions(
review_messages,
messages_snapshot,
)
if actions:
summary = " · ".join(dict.fromkeys(actions))
agent._safe_print(
f" 💾 Self-improvement review: {summary}"
)
_bg_cb = agent.background_review_callback
if _bg_cb:
try:
_bg_cb(
f"💾 Self-improvement review: {summary}"
)
except Exception:
pass
except Exception as e:
logger.warning("Background memory/skill review failed: %s", e)
agent._emit_auxiliary_failure("background review", e)
finally:
# Safety-net cleanup for the exception path. Normal
# completion already shut down inside redirect_stdout above.
# Re-open devnull here so any teardown output (Honcho flush,
# Hindsight sync, background thread joins) stays silent even
# on the exception path where redirect_stdout already exited.
if review_agent is not None:
try:
with open(os.devnull, "w", encoding="utf-8") as _fn, \
contextlib.redirect_stdout(_fn), \
contextlib.redirect_stderr(_fn):
try:
review_agent.shutdown_memory_provider()
except Exception:
pass
try:
review_agent.close()
except Exception:
pass
except Exception:
pass
# Clear the approval callback on this bg-review thread so a
# recycled thread-id doesn't inherit a stale reference.
try:
_set_approval_callback(None)
except Exception:
pass
def spawn_background_review_thread(
agent: Any,
messages_snapshot: List[Dict],
review_memory: bool = False,
review_skills: bool = False,
):
"""Build the review thread target and prompt for a background review.
Returns a ``(target, prompt)`` tuple. The caller (``AIAgent._spawn_background_review``)
owns the actual ``threading.Thread`` construction so test-level patches
of ``run_agent.threading.Thread`` keep working.
"""
# Pick the right prompt based on which triggers fired. Allow per-agent
# override (the prompts moved to module-level constants but old code paths
# that set agent._MEMORY_REVIEW_PROMPT etc. directly keep working).
if review_memory and review_skills:
prompt = getattr(agent, "_COMBINED_REVIEW_PROMPT", _COMBINED_REVIEW_PROMPT)
elif review_memory:
prompt = getattr(agent, "_MEMORY_REVIEW_PROMPT", _MEMORY_REVIEW_PROMPT)
else:
prompt = getattr(agent, "_SKILL_REVIEW_PROMPT", _SKILL_REVIEW_PROMPT)
def _target() -> None:
_run_review_in_thread(agent, messages_snapshot, prompt)
return _target, prompt
__all__ = [
"_MEMORY_REVIEW_PROMPT",
"_SKILL_REVIEW_PROMPT",
"_COMBINED_REVIEW_PROMPT",
"spawn_background_review_thread",
"summarize_background_review_actions",
"build_memory_write_metadata",
]