When a dangerous command was blocked and the user approved it via /approve,
the command was executed but the agent loop had already exited — the agent
never received the command output and the task died silently.
Now _handle_approve_command sends immediate feedback to the user, then
creates a synthetic continuation message with the command output and feeds
it through _handle_message so the agent picks up where it left off.
- Send command result to chat immediately via adapter.send()
- Create synthetic MessageEvent with command + output as context
- Spawn asyncio task to re-invoke agent via _handle_message
- Return None (feedback already sent directly)
- Add test for agent re-invocation after approval
- Update existing approval tests for new return behavior
The gateway approval system previously intercepted bare 'yes'/'no' text
from the user's next message to approve/deny dangerous commands. This was
fragile and dangerous — if the agent asked a clarify question and the user
said 'yes' to answer it, the gateway would execute the pending dangerous
command instead. (Fixes#1888)
Changes:
- Remove bare text matching ('yes', 'y', 'approve', 'ok', etc.) from
_handle_message approval check
- Add /approve and /deny as gateway-only slash commands in the command
registry
- /approve supports scoping: /approve (one-time), /approve session,
/approve always (permanent)
- Add 5-minute timeout for stale approvals
- Gateway appends structured instructions to the agent response when a
dangerous command is pending, telling the user exactly how to respond
- 9 tests covering approve, deny, timeout, scoping, and verification
that bare 'yes' no longer triggers execution
Credit to @solo386 and @FlyByNight69420 for identifying and reporting
this security issue in PR #1971 and issue #1888.
Co-authored-by: Test <test@test.com>
