Remove unused imports (F401) and duplicate/shadowed import
redefinitions (F811) across the codebase using ruff's safe
autofixes. No behavioral changes -- imports only.
- ~1400 safe autofixes applied across 644 files (net -1072 lines)
- __init__.py re-exports preserved (excluded from F401 removal so
public re-export surfaces stay intact)
- Re-exports that are imported or monkeypatched by tests but look
unused in their defining module are kept with explicit # noqa:
F401 (gateway/run.py load_dotenv; run_agent re-exports from
agent.message_sanitization, agent.context_compressor,
agent.retry_utils, agent.prompt_builder, agent.process_bootstrap,
agent.codex_responses_adapter)
- Unsafe F841 (unused-variable) fixes deliberately skipped -- those
can change behavior when the RHS has side effects
- ruff lints remain disabled in pyproject.toml (only PLW1514 is
selected); this is a one-time cleanup, not a config change
Verification:
- python -m compileall: clean
- pytest --collect-only: all 27161 tests collect (zero import errors)
- core entry points import clean (run_agent, model_tools, cli,
toolsets, hermes_state, batch_runner, gateway)
- static scan: every name any test imports directly from an edited
module still resolves
Six days after #23937 (608 fixes) the codebase had accumulated 241 new
PLR6201 violations. Same mechanical `x in (...)` → `x in {...}` fix,
same zero-risk profile: set lookup is O(1) vs O(n) for tuple and the
two are semantically equivalent for hashable scalar membership tests.
All 241 instances fixed via `ruff check --select PLR6201 --fix
--unsafe-fixes`, zero remaining. Every changed value is a hashable
scalar (str/int/None/enum/signal); no risk of unhashable runtime
errors. No behavior change.
Test plan:
- 119 files changed, +244/-244 (net zero) — exactly one-line edits
- `ruff check` clean afterward
- Compile checks pass on the largest touched files (cli.py, run_agent.py,
gateway/run.py, gateway/platforms/discord.py, model_tools.py)
- Subset broad test run on tests/gateway/ tests/hermes_cli/ tests/agent/
tests/tools/: 18187 passed, 59 pre-existing failures (verified against
origin/main with the same shape — identical failure count, identical
category — all xdist test-order flakes unrelated to this change)
Follows the same template as PR #23937 ([tracker: #23972](https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/23972)).
Thread a vision-request flag through auxiliary provider resolution so Copilot clients can include Copilot-Vision-Request only for vision tasks. This preserves normal text requests while ensuring Copilot vision payloads reach the vision-capable route.
Add regression coverage for Copilot vision routing and keep cached text and vision clients separate so a text client without the header is not reused for vision.
Co-authored-by: dhabibi <9087935+dhabibi@users.noreply.github.com>
## Merged
Adds MiMo v2.5-pro and v2.5 support to Xiaomi native provider, OpenCode Go, and setup wizard.
### Changes
- Context lengths: added v2.5-pro (1M) and v2.5 (1M), corrected existing MiMo entries to exact values (262144)
- Provider lists: xiaomi, opencode-go, setup wizard
- Vision: upgraded from mimo-v2-omni to mimo-v2.5 (omnimodal)
- Config description updated for XIAOMI_API_KEY
- Tests updated for new vision model preference
### Verification
- 4322 tests passed, 0 new regressions
- Live API tested on Xiaomi portal: basic, reasoning, tool calling, multi-tool, file ops, system prompt, vision — all pass
- Self-review found and fixed 2 issues (redundant vision check, stale HuggingFace context length)
Before: aggregator users (OpenRouter / Nous Portal) running 'auto'
routing for auxiliary tasks — compression, vision, web extraction,
session search, etc. — got routed to a cheap provider-side default
model (Gemini Flash). Non-aggregator users already got their main
model. Behavior was inconsistent and surprising — users picked
Claude / GPT / their preferred model, but side tasks ran on
Gemini Flash.
After: 'auto' means "use my main chat model" for every user,
regardless of provider type. Only when the main provider has no
working client does the fallback chain run (OpenRouter → Nous →
custom → Codex → API-key providers). Explicit per-task overrides
in config.yaml (auxiliary.<task>.provider / .model) still win —
they are a hard constraint, not subject to the auto policy.
Vision auto-detection follows the same policy: try main provider +
main model first (with _PROVIDER_VISION_MODELS overrides preserved
for providers like xiaomi and zai that ship a dedicated multimodal
model distinct from their chat model). Aggregator strict vision
backends are fallbacks, not the primary path.
Changes:
- agent/auxiliary_client.py: _resolve_auto() drops the
`_AGGREGATOR_PROVIDERS` guard. resolve_vision_provider_client()
auto branch unifies aggregator and exotic-provider paths —
everyone goes through resolve_provider_client() with main_model.
Dead _AGGREGATOR_PROVIDERS constant removed (was only used by
the guard we just removed).
- hermes_cli/main.py: aux config menu copy updated to reflect
the new semantics ("'auto' means 'use my main model'").
- tests/agent/test_auxiliary_main_first.py: 12 regression tests
covering OpenRouter/Nous/DeepSeek main paths, runtime-override
wins, explicit-config wins, vision override preservation for
exotic providers, and fallback-chain activation when the main
provider has no working client.
Co-authored-by: teknium1 <teknium@nousresearch.com>
