The security scanner is meant to protect against hostile external skills
pulled from GitHub via hermes skills install — trusted/community policies
block or ask on dangerous verdicts accordingly. But agent-created skills
(from skill_manage) run in the same process as the agent that wrote them.
The agent can already execute the same code paths via terminal() with no
gate, so the ask-on-dangerous policy adds friction without meaningful
security.
Concrete trigger: an agent writing a PR-review skill that describes
cache-busting or persistence semantics in prose gets blocked because
those words appear in the patterns list. The skill isn't actually doing
anything dangerous — it's just documenting what reviewers should watch
for in other PRs.
Change: agent-created dangerous verdict maps to 'allow' instead of 'ask'.
External hub installs (trusted/community) keep their stricter policies
intact. Tests updated: renamed test_dangerous_agent_created_asks →
test_dangerous_agent_created_allowed; renamed force-override test and
updated assertion since force is now a no-op for agent-created (the allow
branch returns first).
* fix(skills): reduce skills.sh resolution churn and preserve trust for wrapped identifiers
- Accept common skills.sh prefix typos (skils-sh/, skils.sh/)
- Strip skills-sh/ prefix in _resolve_trust_level() so trusted repos
stay trusted when installed through skills.sh
- Use resolved identifier (from bundle/meta) for scan_skill source
- Prefer tree search before root scan in _discover_identifier()
- Add _resolve_github_meta() consolidation for inspect flow
Cherry-picked from PR #3001 by kshitijk4poor.
* fix: restore candidate loop in SkillsShSource.fetch() for consistency
The cherry-picked PR only tried the first candidate identifier in
fetch() while inspect() (via _resolve_github_meta) tried all four.
This meant skills at repo/skills/path would be found by inspect but
missed by fetch, forcing it through the heavier _discover_identifier
flow. Restore the candidate loop so both paths behave identically.
Updated the test assertion to match.
---------
Co-authored-by: kshitijk4poor <82637225+kshitijk4poor@users.noreply.github.com>
Changes the policy for agent-created skills with critical security
findings from 'block' (silently rejected) to 'ask' (allowed with
warning logged). The agent created the skill, so blocking it entirely
is too aggressive — let it through but log the findings.
- Policy: agent-created dangerous changed from block to ask
- should_allow_install returns None for 'ask' (vs True/False)
- format_scan_report shows 'NEEDS CONFIRMATION' for ask
- skill_manager_tool.py caller handles None (allows with warning)
- force=True still overrides as before
Based on PR #2271 by redhelix (closed — 3200 lines of unrelated
Mission Control code excluded).
Agent-created skills were using the same policy as community hub
installs, blocking any skill with medium/high severity findings
(e.g. docker pull, pip install, git clone). This meant the agent
couldn't create skills that reference Docker or other common tools.
Changed agent-created policy from (allow, block, block) to
(allow, allow, block) — matching the trusted policy. Caution-level
findings (medium/high severity) are now allowed through, while
dangerous findings (critical severity like exfiltration, prompt
injection, reverse shells) remain blocked.
Added 4 tests covering the agent-created policy: safe allowed,
caution allowed, dangerous blocked, force override.
Salvaged from PR #1007 by stablegenius49.
- let INSTALL_POLICY decide dangerous verdict handling for builtin skills
- allow --force to override blocked dangerous decisions for trusted and community sources
- accept --yes / -y as aliases for --force in /skills install
- update regression tests to match the intended policy precedence
Authored by Farukest. Fixes#387.
Removes 'and not force' from the dangerous verdict check so --force
can never install skills with critical security findings (reverse shells,
data exfiltration, etc). The docstring already documented this behavior
but the code didn't enforce it.
The docstring states --force should never override dangerous verdicts,
but the condition `if result.verdict == "dangerous" and not force`
allowed force=True to skip the early return. Execution then fell
through to `if force: return True`, bypassing the policy block.
Removed `and not force` so dangerous skills are always blocked
regardless of the --force flag.
The symlink escape check in _check_structure() used startswith()
without a trailing separator. A symlink resolving to a sibling
directory with a shared prefix (e.g. 'axolotl-backdoor') would pass
the check for 'axolotl' since the string prefix matched.
Replaced with Path.is_relative_to() which correctly handles directory
boundaries and is consistent with the skill_view path check.
