diff --git a/tests/tools/test_fuzzy_match.py b/tests/tools/test_fuzzy_match.py
index b4e3640e2bd..302250bc595 100644
--- a/tests/tools/test_fuzzy_match.py
+++ b/tests/tools/test_fuzzy_match.py
@@ -429,3 +429,75 @@ class TestFormatNoMatchHint:
         )
         assert result == ""
 
+
+class TestEscapeNormalizedNewString:
+    """Regression tests for unescaping common sequences in new_string
+    when the match succeeded via the escape_normalized strategy.
+
+    Issue #33733: LLMs overwhelmingly represent tabs as the two-character
+    sequence \\t (backslash + t) in JSON tool-call arguments. When the file
+    contains real tab bytes (0x09), the escape_normalized strategy matches
+    old_string by unescaping it — but new_string was written as-is, leaving
+    literal \\t characters in the file.
+    """
+
+    def test_tab_in_new_string_unescaped(self):
+        """File has real tab, model sends literal \\t in new_string."""
+        content = "def hello():\n\tprint(\"before\")\n"
+        old_string = "def hello():\n\\tprint(\"before\")\n"
+        new_string = "def hello():\n\\tprint(\"after\")\n"
+        new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(content, old_string, new_string)
+        assert err is None, f"Unexpected error: {err}"
+        assert count == 1
+        assert strategy == "escape_normalized"
+        # Must contain a real tab, not literal \t
+        assert "\tprint(\"after\")" in new
+        assert "\\t" not in new
+
+    def test_newline_in_new_string_unescaped(self):
+        """File has real newlines, model sends literal \\n in new_string."""
+        content = "line1\nline2\nline3\n"
+        old_string = "line1\\nline2\\n"
+        new_string = "line1\\nreplaced\\n"
+        new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(content, old_string, new_string)
+        assert err is None, f"Unexpected error: {err}"
+        assert count == 1
+        assert strategy == "escape_normalized"
+        assert "replaced" in new
+        assert "\\n" not in new
+
+    def test_carriage_return_in_new_string_unescaped(self):
+        """File has real CR, model sends literal \\r in new_string."""
+        content = "line1\r\nline2\r\n"
+        old_string = "line1\\r\\nline2\\r\\n"
+        new_string = "replaced\\r\\n"
+        new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(content, old_string, new_string)
+        assert err is None, f"Unexpected error: {err}"
+        assert count == 1
+        assert strategy == "escape_normalized"
+        assert "replaced\r" in new
+
+    def test_mixed_escape_sequences_in_new_string(self):
+        """Model sends \\t and \\n together in new_string."""
+        content = "def foo():\n\tpass\n"
+        old_string = "def foo():\\n\\tpass\\n"
+        new_string = "def bar():\\n\\treturn 1\\n"
+        new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(content, old_string, new_string)
+        assert err is None, f"Unexpected error: {err}"
+        assert count == 1
+        assert strategy == "escape_normalized"
+        assert "\treturn 1" in new
+        assert "\\t" not in new
+        assert "\\n" not in new
+
+    def test_exact_match_preserves_literal_escapes(self):
+        """When matching via exact strategy, literal \\t in new_string should
+        NOT be unescaped — the file genuinely contains backslash-t characters."""
+        content = "path = \"C:\\\\Users\\\"\n"
+        old_string = "path = \"C:\\\\Users\\\"\n"
+        new_string = "path = \"D:\\\\data\\\"\n"
+        new, count, strategy, err = fuzzy_find_and_replace(content, old_string, new_string)
+        assert err is None
+        assert strategy == "exact"
+        # Literal backslashes should be preserved
+        assert "\\\\" in new
diff --git a/tools/fuzzy_match.py b/tools/fuzzy_match.py
index ef6248494a4..2003f035faa 100644
--- a/tools/fuzzy_match.py
+++ b/tools/fuzzy_match.py
@@ -113,8 +113,16 @@ def fuzzy_find_and_replace(content: str, old_string: str, new_string: str,
             # old_string/new_string — e.g. LLM used 2-space indent but the
             # file is 4-space. Shift new_string by the indentation delta so
             # the replacement matches the file's actual indent pattern.
+            effective_new = new_string
+            if strategy_name == "escape_normalized":
+                # The escape_normalized strategy matched because old_string
+                # contained literal \t/\n/\r that were unescaped to match
+                # real control characters in the file. Apply the same
+                # unescaping to new_string so we don't write literal
+                # backslash sequences where the file has real tabs/newlines.
+                effective_new = _unescape_common_sequences(new_string)
             new_content = _apply_replacements(
-                content, matches, new_string,
+                content, matches, effective_new,
                 old_string=old_string if strategy_name != "exact" else None,
             )
             return new_content, len(matches), strategy_name, None
@@ -247,6 +255,19 @@ def _reindent_replacement(file_region: str, old_string: str, new_string: str) ->
     return "\n".join(out_lines)
 
 
+def _unescape_common_sequences(s: str) -> str:
+    """Unescape common C-style escape sequences that LLMs produce literally.
+
+    When the model sends ``\\t`` (two characters: backslash + t) instead of a
+    real tab byte (0x09), the patch tool would write the literal characters.
+    This helper converts common escape sequences to their actual byte values.
+
+    Only call this when the matching strategy confirmed that the file already
+    contains real control characters (i.e. ``escape_normalized`` matched).
+    """
+    return s.replace('\\t', '\t').replace('\\n', '\n').replace('\\r', '\r')
+
+
 def _apply_replacements(content: str, matches: List[Tuple[int, int]],
                         new_string: str, old_string: Optional[str] = None) -> str:
     """