fix(patch): gate 'did you mean?' to no-match + extend to v4a/skill_manage

Follow-ups on top of @teyrebaz33's cherry-picked commit:

1. New shared helper format_no_match_hint() in fuzzy_match.py with a
   startswith('Could not find') gate so the snippet only appends to
   genuine no-match errors — not to 'Found N matches' (ambiguous),
   'Escape-drift detected', or 'identical strings' errors, which would
   all mislead the model.

2. file_tools.patch_tool suppresses the legacy generic '[Hint: old_string
   not found...]' string when the rich 'Did you mean?' snippet is
   already attached — no more double-hint.

3. Wire the same helper into patch_parser.py (V4A patch mode, both
   _validate_operations and _apply_update) and skill_manager_tool.py so
   all three fuzzy callers surface the hint consistently.

Tests: 7 new gating tests in TestFormatNoMatchHint cover every error
class (ambiguous, drift, identical, non-zero match count, None error,
no similar content, happy path). 34/34 test_fuzzy_match, 96/96
test_file_tools + test_patch_parser + test_skill_manager_tool pass.
E2E verified across all four scenarios: no-match-with-similar,
no-match-no-similar, ambiguous, success. V4A mode confirmed
end-to-end with a non-matching hunk.
This commit is contained in:
Teknium 2026-04-21 01:59:58 -07:00 committed by Teknium
parent 15abf4ed8f
commit 5e6427a42c
6 changed files with 115 additions and 8 deletions

View file

@ -741,10 +741,8 @@ class ShellFileOperations(FileOperations):
if error or match_count == 0:
err_msg = error or f"Could not find match for old_string in {path}"
try:
from tools.fuzzy_match import find_closest_lines
hint = find_closest_lines(old_string, content)
if hint:
err_msg += "\n\nDid you mean one of these sections?\n" + hint
from tools.fuzzy_match import format_no_match_hint
err_msg += format_no_match_hint(err_msg, match_count, old_string, content)
except Exception:
pass
return PatchResult(error=err_msg)

View file

@ -670,8 +670,11 @@ def patch_tool(mode: str = "replace", path: str = None, old_string: str = None,
result_json = json.dumps(result_dict, ensure_ascii=False)
# Hint when old_string not found — saves iterations where the agent
# retries with stale content instead of re-reading the file.
# Suppressed when patch_replace already attached a rich "Did you mean?"
# snippet (which is strictly more useful than the generic hint).
if result_dict.get("error") and "Could not find" in str(result_dict["error"]):
result_json += "\n\n[Hint: old_string not found. Use read_file to verify the current content, or search_files to locate the text.]"
if "Did you mean one of these sections?" not in str(result_dict["error"]):
result_json += "\n\n[Hint: old_string not found. Use read_file to verify the current content, or search_files to locate the text.]"
return result_json
except Exception as e:
return tool_error(str(e))

View file

@ -681,3 +681,24 @@ def find_closest_lines(old_string: str, content: str, context_lines: int = 2, ma
return ""
return "\n---\n".join(parts)
def format_no_match_hint(error: Optional[str], match_count: int,
old_string: str, content: str) -> str:
"""Return a '\\n\\nDid you mean...' snippet for plain no-match errors.
Gated so the hint only fires for actual "old_string not found" failures.
Ambiguous-match ("Found N matches"), escape-drift, and identical-strings
errors all have ``match_count == 0`` but a "did you mean?" snippet would
be misleading those failed for unrelated reasons.
Returns an empty string when there's nothing useful to append.
"""
if match_count != 0:
return ""
if not error or not error.startswith("Could not find"):
return ""
hint = find_closest_lines(old_string, content)
if not hint:
return ""
return "\n\nDid you mean one of these sections?\n" + hint

View file

@ -290,10 +290,16 @@ def _validate_operations(
)
if count == 0:
label = f"'{hunk.context_hint}'" if hunk.context_hint else "(no hint)"
errors.append(
msg = (
f"{op.file_path}: hunk {label} not found"
+ (f"{match_error}" if match_error else "")
)
try:
from tools.fuzzy_match import format_no_match_hint
msg += format_no_match_hint(match_error, count, search_pattern, simulated)
except Exception:
pass
errors.append(msg)
else:
# Advance simulation so subsequent hunks validate correctly.
# Reuse the result from the call above — no second fuzzy run.
@ -537,7 +543,13 @@ def _apply_update(op: PatchOperation, file_ops: Any) -> Tuple[bool, str]:
error = None
if error:
return False, f"Could not apply hunk: {error}"
err_msg = f"Could not apply hunk: {error}"
try:
from tools.fuzzy_match import format_no_match_hint
err_msg += format_no_match_hint(error, 0, search_pattern, new_content)
except Exception:
pass
return False, err_msg
else:
# Addition-only hunk (no context or removed lines).
# Insert at the location indicated by the context hint, or at end of file.

View file

@ -449,9 +449,15 @@ def _patch_skill(
if match_error:
# Show a short preview of the file so the model can self-correct
preview = content[:500] + ("..." if len(content) > 500 else "")
err_msg = match_error
try:
from tools.fuzzy_match import format_no_match_hint
err_msg += format_no_match_hint(match_error, match_count, old_string, content)
except Exception:
pass
return {
"success": False,
"error": match_error,
"error": err_msg,
"file_preview": preview,
}